(Received 27 November 2001; accepted 16 March 2001)
Published Online: January
| ||Format||Pages||Price|| |
|PDF Version||4||$25||  ADD TO CART|
Within the context of a criminal investigation the human bitemark traditionally provides the forensic dentist with both physical and biological evidence. In recent years, however, examples exist where in addition to discussing physical and biological evidence, expert witnesses have also testified in court regarding the behavioral aspects of biting behavior. Interested in this additional source of evidence, the authors reviewed the research literature from which biting behavior could be explained. The review found a hiatus of empirical knowledge in this respect, with only two papers seemingly related to the topic.
With this dearth of knowledge in mind, the authors present a framework for further analysis and tentatively suggest reasons for biting behaviors, using a range of psychological models. The article ends with a cautionary note that vague and often misleading behavioral assumptions must not be applied to bitemark testimony until further data are available.
Lecturer, University of Huddersfield,
Special agent, Statewide Coordinator of the Criminal Assessment/Profiling Program, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Tallahassee, FL
Director, Bureau of Legal Dentistry, University of British Columbia,
Doctoral student, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liverpool,
Stock #: JFS15208J