Radiography of Perforating Centerfire Rifle Wounds of the Trunk

    Volume 45, Issue 3 (May 2000)

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    CODEN: JFSOAD

    Page Count: 5


    Wilson, AJ
    Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA

    Bannach, BG
    Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Edmonton, Alberta

    Straathof, D
    Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Edmonton, Alberta

    Dowling, GP
    Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Edmonton, Alberta

    (Received 4 January 1999; accepted 30 August 1999)

    Abstract

    All deaths resulting from perforating centerfire rifle wounds of the chest and abdomen, investigated by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner for the Province of Alberta from 1988 to 1995, were reviewed retrospectively to determine whether the radiographic distribution of bullet fragments in such cases is a useful predictor of bullet trajectory. Study cases were limited to single gunshot wounds without surgical intervention or intermediate targets, and for which adequate radiography was available. Three pathologists individually viewed the radiographs on two separate occasions; wound locations were provided for the second viewing (Group 2). Differences in opinion regarding direction of fire were resolved by consensus review. A trauma radiologist independently made two sets of interpretations in the same way. Comparisons of these groups of interpretations were made with the actual bullet direction determined at autopsy. Of 21 cases included in the study, only three (14.3%) did not require consensus resolution in either group. Accuracy of pathologists' interpretation improved from 38.1% (8/21) to 76.2% (16/21) with provision of wound locations (p = 0.012). The radiologist achieved similar improvement, from 28.6% (6/21) to 47.6% (10/21). The rate of agreement between radiologist and pathologists increased from 42.9% (9/21) to 61.9% (13/21) between Groups 1 and 2. Both the pathologists and radiologist interpreted several cases the same way in both groups; of those cases interpreted differently, the second interpretation was occasionally incorrect after correct interpretation in Group 1. We conclude that bullet direction for perforating centerfire rifle wounds cannot be accurately determined from postmortem radiographs. When wound location is known, the ability to predict bullet direction improves but is still subject to error, including a lack of consistency between observers.


    Paper ID: JFS14734J

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS14734J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Radiography of Perforating Centerfire Rifle Wounds of the Trunk
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30