Volume 37, Issue 6 (November 1992)

    The Decision Theory of Paternity Disputes: Optimization Considerations Applied to Multilocus DNA Fingerprinting

    (Received 11 January 1992; accepted 4 March 1992)

    CODEN: JFSOAD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF Version 9 $25   ADD TO CART


    Abstract

    The solution of paternity disputes using results from scientific analyses is studied from a decision-theoretical viewpoint. Two alternative approaches to decision making, the so-called ‘Bayes’ and ‘Minimax’ strategies, are described and discussed. If prior probabilities of paternity are exactly known, then Bayes decisions are (a) independent of the source of evidence and (b) optimal with respect to average losses caused by wrong decisions. However, it is concluded that Minimax decisions, which depend upon the employed test system but not upon prior probabilities, are more appropriate in paternity cases if equal prior good will towards disclaimed children and alleged fathers is demanded. It is further demonstrated that, when major evidence about paternity comes from multilocus DNA fingerprinting, prior probabilities must be known quite accurately for Bayes decisions to be superior with respect to average losses. Finally, we are able to show that ‘quasi’ Bayes decision making, that is, adopting a neutral prior probability of 0.5 but leaving thresholds for decision making unchanged, coincides with Minimax decision making if multilocus DNA fingerprinting is employed.


    Author Information:

    Schmidtke, J
    Professors, MHH, Abteilung Humangenetik Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover,

    Krawczak, M
    Professors, MHH, Abteilung Humangenetik Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover,


    Stock #: JFS13343J

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS13343J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title The Decision Theory of Paternity Disputes: Optimization Considerations Applied to Multilocus DNA Fingerprinting
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30