Volume 30, Issue 2 (April 1985)

    Qualifying the Psychiatrist as a Lay Witness: A Reaction to the American Psychiatric Association Petition in Barefoot v. Estelle

    (Received 24 July 1984; accepted 3 October 1984)

    CODEN: JFSOAD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 5 $25   ADD TO CART


    Abstract

    Organized psychiatry has recently begun to define limits to expert testimony. The American Psychiatric Association filed an amicus brief in the case of Barefoot v. Estelle urging legal curtailment of psychiatric testimony as to future dangerousness and prohibition on Constitutional grounds of expert psychiatric testimony solely based on hypothetical data. The Supreme Court refused relief on both questions. Psychiatric testimony to ultimate questions at law is limited by the inherent contextual variables of psychiatric clinical and experimental knowledge and practice. A forensic science model for psychiatric participation with explicit psychiatrically defined limitations is proposed using competence to stand trial as an example.


    Author Information:

    Sullwold, AF
    Assistant professor, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

    Bennett, GT
    Professor of law, Holland Law Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL


    Stock #: JFS11826J

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS11826J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Qualifying the Psychiatrist as a Lay Witness: A Reaction to the American Psychiatric Association Petition in Barefoot v. Estelle
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30