Nature of Jury Response to the Expert Witness

    Volume 28, Issue 2 (April 1983)

    ISSN: 0022-1198


    Published Online: 1 April 1983

    Page Count: 4

    Rosenthal, P
    Chairman of Communications Studies Program, University of California, Los Angeles,

    (Received 2 August 1982; accepted 9 August 1982)


    Communications to jurors entail not only primary content—the subject matter of the testimony—designated as the message, but also secondary content emanating from the witnesses as sources, from peripheral aspects of the message itself, and from the environment of the trial—designated as the paramessage. Interviews with jurors after a trial involving extensive expert testimony to introduce a new technology for identification evidence, popularly referred to as “voiceprinting,” found they responded mainly to the paramessage. The general implication is that when confronted with complex or confusing testimony, expert or otherwise, jurors will shift their focus to observable characteristics of the sources of the information, or to other ancillary elements of the situation, and will be guided in their response by information and inferences derived from such data.

    Paper ID: JFS11541J

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS11541J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Title Nature of Jury Response to the Expert Witness
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30