Striation Evidence in Counterfeiting Cases

    Volume 28, Issue 2 (April 1983)

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    CODEN: JFSOAD

    Published Online: 1 April 1983

    Page Count: 12


    Winand, JE
    Document/voiceprint examiner and examiner of questioned documents, U.S. Secret Service, Washington, D.C.

    Cain, S
    Document/voiceprint examiner and examiner of questioned documents, U.S. Secret Service, Washington, D.C.

    (Received 16 March 1982; accepted 12 August 1982)

    Abstract

    There has been little information of recent vintage that deals with those unique striation mark identification criteria normally associated with paper cutting tools. Occasionally, forensic science laboratories have been provided with striation evidence where improper collection and transmittal procedures have hampered subsequent edge comparison analysis. This paper has been written in an attempt to bridge the generation gap with more recent tool mark evidence processing procedures. There are a variety of identification factors that are important in striation comparisons and should be considered by both the field investigators and administrative personnel in the transmittal and collection of pertinent evidence. The following factors are discussed in the paper: (1) production of striation markings, (2) variation in striation markings, (3) importance of clamp impression markings, (4) proper preservation and transmittal procedures for tool mark evidence, (S) collection of tool mark standards, and (6) a recent U.S. Secret Service counterfeiting case illustration.


    Paper ID: JFS11516J

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS11516J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Striation Evidence in Counterfeiting Cases
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30