Volume 23, Issue 4 (October 1978)

    Phase Contrast Microscopy Versus Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy as Applicable to the Observation of Spermatozoa

    (Received 13 December 1977; accepted 17 April 1978)

    Published Online: October

    CODEN: JFSOAD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 3 $25   ADD TO CART


    Abstract

    A review of available literature has shown something of a paucity of suggested and applied microscopic techniques on the identification of human spermatozoa in forensic casework. Phase contrast microscopy (PC) has been mentioned as the desirable technique by Kirk [1] and Kivela [2]. The advantages of PC as compared with bright-field are well known and would most certainly include simplifying the task of locating any spermatozoa present. Some other advantages are an apparent improvement in the morphological detail presented to the observer and some reduction in the fatigue associated with the eyestrain accompanying this frequently tedious task.


    Author Information:

    Boudreau, AJ
    Criminalist, Fresno County Sheriffs Department Crime Laboratory, Fresno, Calif.

    Cortner, GV
    Criminalist, Fresno Regional Criminalistics Laboratory, Fresno, Calif.


    Stock #: JFS10744J

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS10744J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Phase Contrast Microscopy Versus Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy as Applicable to the Observation of Spermatozoa
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30