You are being redirected because this document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.
    This document is part of your ASTM Compass® subscription.

    Volume 23, Issue 3 (July 1978)

    Alternatives in Psychiatric Testimony on Dangerousness

    (Received 27 October 1977; accepted 2 December 1977)

    Published Online: July

    CODEN: JFSOAD

      Format Pages Price  
    PDF 8 $25   ADD TO CART

    Cite this document

    X Add email address send
    X
      .RIS For RefWorks, EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zoteo, and many others.   .DOCX For Microsoft Word



    Abstract

    In the District of Columbia, as in many state jurisdictions, psychiatrists are likely to encounter the issue of testifying in a court regarding their “predictions of future dangerousness” in two situations: (a) during the process of involuntary civil commitment or commitment after a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity in a criminal case and (b) upon petition for a conditional or unconditional release after commitment in a criminal case [1ߝ3]. The criteria for civil commitment in the District of Columbia are mental illness and a finding that the mentally ill individual is likely to injure himself or others because of his mental illness [4]. The standard is similar after a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity [5, 6].


    Author Information:

    Smith, JT
    Medical officer, Psychiatry, Division of Forensic Programs; and attorney, Office of the Legal Advisor, Saint Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C.

    English, MJ
    Medical officer, Psychiatry, Division of Forensic Programs; and attorney, Office of the Legal Advisor, Saint Elizabeth's Hospital, Washington, D.C.


    Stock #: JFS10710J

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS10710J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Alternatives in Psychiatric Testimony on Dangerousness
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30