Voiceprirt Identification in the Courtroom

    Volume 18, Issue 3 (July 1973)

    ISSN: 0022-1198

    CODEN: JFSOAD

    Published Online: 1 July 1973

    Page Count: 5


    Gocke, JW
    Special Assistant for Legal Affairs, AFIP, Ft. Meade, Md.

    Oleniewski, WA
    Special Assistant for Legal Affairs, AFIP, Ft. Meade, Md.

    Abstract

    In a recent article appearing in the Journal of Forensic Sciences, J. J. Hennessey and C. H. Romig presented a review of the experiments involving identification by voice-print spectrograms, concluding that the various experiments in the field were conflicting, neither denying nor confirming the validity of voiceprint identification. This disagreement among scientists has had a tremendous affect on the admissibility of voiceprint identification as evidence in judicial proceedings. With one exception, until the end of 1970 evidence of voiceprint identification has been held inadmissible. Since that time, the results of an extensive experiment on voice identification conducted by Dr. Oscar Tosi, Professor of Audiology and Speech Sciences, Michigan State University, have been released and greatly strengthened the argument for the admissibility of voiceprint identification as competent evidence.


    Paper ID: JFS10447J

    DOI: 10.1520/JFS10447J

    ASTM International
    is a member of CrossRef.

    Author
    Title Voiceprirt Identification in the Courtroom
    Symposium , 0000-00-00
    Committee E30