Class 6.2 in Table 3.1 should read Class 6.25. This would make it consistent with the other Classes and their thickness in this Table - Class and thickness are the same number. Also, in S1.5 the standard already refers to the Class as 6.25. It is my believe that the difference in Table 3.1 was due to an incorrect entry and should have been 6.25. All the rest of the standard should be reapproved as is.
Keywordsconnectors; contacts; electrical connectors; electrical contacts; engineering coatings; reflectors; relays; relay switches; rhodium; rhodium coatings; rhodium electrodeposits; rhodium platings; Electrodeposited coatings--specifications; Engineered electrodeposited coatings--specifications; Rhodium;
Negative Votes Need Resolution